|
Post by taikuh on Feb 5, 2015 4:27:07 GMT
Alright then. Next time I'm on a computer I will fix things up accordingly. Maybe make a separate chart for NAPs? A separate chart for NAPs would be nice for us to do a quick-check before raiding, linksith. It almost seems like it would be prudent to call out which alliances specifically don't have NAPs with each other. Basically, assume NAP unless otherwise noted? I don't know what it would be called.... It's hardly an "aggression pact", since that sounds like a state of fully declared war. But it's worth considering. I dunno...will be too complicated for me. I can't reverse negative think easily.
|
|
|
Post by linksith on Feb 5, 2015 15:19:08 GMT
Updates made to the web(s)
|
|
55 posts
|
Post by edr on Feb 6, 2015 2:27:45 GMT
A separate chart for NAPs would be nice for us to do a quick-check before raiding, linksith. >taking NAPs seriously Yea I'll just attack this guy in an alliance which I don't have a NAP with willy nilly
|
|
|
Post by linksith on Feb 6, 2015 5:39:39 GMT
A separate chart for NAPs would be nice for us to do a quick-check before raiding, linksith. >taking NAPs seriously Yea I'll just attack this guy in an alliance which I don't have a NAP with willy nilly It's mainly important for plotting, planning, and coordinating attacks and checking the relations of other alliances
|
|
67 posts
|
Post by whiskertoes on Feb 6, 2015 21:04:23 GMT
1 wish granted to the brony of EUN. Purple border tho because I'm thinking about using the inner circle color for super alliances (if and when they happen that is) thnx
|
|