126 posts
|
Post by TheGreatPterodactlColterKaiser on Mar 30, 2015 0:29:35 GMT
>PEST members getting bullied into quitting Oh how the mighty have fallen.
|
|
126 posts
|
Post by presidentlee on Mar 30, 2015 0:30:45 GMT
your very existence is an irony in itself why don't you follow your master's path and ban people in the IRC can't best the pest in the IRC r-right?
|
|
19 posts
|
Post by Lemon on Mar 30, 2015 0:32:45 GMT
I've been gassed and attacked for defending my alliance member. I'd like robosax to call off his mult...*ahem*...memeber as he is attacking me without any cause. oh hai fellow member of autism, did you get bullied by protecting your members from bullying? I don't really understand what you're saying, so I'm just going to say yes.
|
|
234 posts
|
Post by sirscarf on Mar 30, 2015 0:33:24 GMT
One inch punch is a raider, and you were sending threatening comms to the victim of the raid. It's not that hard to see One inch punch is not a raider, he attacked someone who was inactive(80+ hours offline without notice) and bombed once before going offline for a few hours, Wub became active again and had you immediately double front him attack as you had a advantage over him. If he raiding he wouldn't of been so under equipped as he thought he was dealing with a inactive. >80+ hours offline without notice I've heard a LOT of variation on what constitutes 'inactivity'. In WaW, it might be a week, might be three days. In >BLOC, it might be anywhere from "no raids permissible whatsoever" to "40 hours with or without notice"...
|
|
19 posts
|
Post by Lemon on Mar 30, 2015 0:33:24 GMT
your very existence is an irony in itself why don't you follow your master's path and ban people in the IRC can't best the pest in the IRC r-right? lol who even are you?
|
|
126 posts
|
Post by presidentlee on Mar 30, 2015 0:33:29 GMT
oh hai fellow member of autism, did you get bullied by protecting your members from bullying? I don't really understand what you're saying, so I'm just going to say yes. sorry to hear that i hope robo offers you a chance of redemption
|
|
184 posts
|
Post by robosax on Mar 30, 2015 0:34:09 GMT
Post screens of the damages that One inch punch did to Wub. One inch was offline for 10 hours when Wub returned and Wub attacked and had you attack. One inch most likely only bombed him with his navy for a turn as hes tech was under two levels and army size was below Wubs size as he didn't check those stats, One inch was fairly under equipped to do any harm. test what? The only bullying here is you trying to take advantage of a member of thought he was fighting a inactive and was immediately attacked without question when wub returned. I told him to stop attacking and give One inch peace since he was active again but you and him continued to attack. >just now ask for screens after my news feed has dumped half of the shit he did to me >we're bullying him by attacking him after he attacked me >you then have one of your multis attack lemon before actually talking with him >continued to attack NO SHIT LEFTIST, YOU NEVER OFFERED ME REPS OR ANYTHING, YOU JUST WANTED ME TO ACCEPT GETTING ATTACKED BECAUSE L0L YOUR ALLIANCE IS BIG. YOUR DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN IS AWFUL Those news feeds state that he sent peace at 12:56, lemon attacked after One inch had already sent peace to Wubstep. Reason for the war:
|
|
126 posts
|
Post by presidentlee on Mar 30, 2015 0:34:11 GMT
your very existence is an irony in itself why don't you follow your master's path and ban people in the IRC can't best the pest in the IRC r-right? lol who even are you? nice attempt to pull a poker face
|
|
234 posts
|
Post by sirscarf on Mar 30, 2015 0:36:00 GMT
>PEST members getting bullied into quittingOh how the mighty have fallen. Wait, who's quitting? grumble grumble bullies making dedgaem even dedder grumble
|
|
19 posts
|
Post by Lemon on Mar 30, 2015 0:36:03 GMT
One inch punch is not a raider, he attacked someone who was inactive(80+ hours offline without notice) and bombed once before going offline for a few hours, Wub became active again and had you immediately double front him attack as you had a advantage over him. If he raiding he wouldn't of been so under equipped as he thought he was dealing with a inactive. >80+ hours offline without notice I've heard a LOT of variation on what constitutes 'inactivity'. In WaW, it might be a week, might be three days. In >BLOC, it might be anywhere from "no raids permissible whatsoever" to "40 hours with or without notice"... This. Assigning some random duration for inactivity is for the alliance to decide. Our policy does not allow any sort of raiding whatsoever. And seeing as your member attacked s-zet without even asking what our policy was on this, I think he can be classified as a raider.
|
|
126 posts
|
Post by TheGreatPterodactlColterKaiser on Mar 30, 2015 0:40:32 GMT
>PEST members getting bullied into quittingOh how the mighty have fallen. Wait, who's quitting? grumble grumble bullies making dedgaem even dedder grumbleRobo says in the caps in OP that he intends to make Wub quit if he doesn't just bite the pillow and gratefully accept Zionist dick up his ass. There was a time when PEST would have just spyfucked Robo into oblivion for that kind of disrespect instead of appealing to the forums for sympathy. Where is Cxc's leadership when you need it want a happening?
|
|
126 posts
|
Post by presidentlee on Mar 30, 2015 0:41:50 GMT
>PEST members getting bullied into quittingOh how the mighty have fallen. Wait, who's quitting? grumble grumble bullies making dedgaem even dedder grumblenewfag detected
|
|
234 posts
|
Post by sirscarf on Mar 30, 2015 0:43:24 GMT
>80+ hours offline without notice I've heard a LOT of variation on what constitutes 'inactivity'. In WaW, it might be a week, might be three days. In >BLOC, it might be anywhere from "no raids permissible whatsoever" to "40 hours with or without notice"... This. Assigning some random duration for inactivity is for the alliance to decide. Our policy does not allow any sort of raiding whatsoever. And seeing as your member attacked s-zet without even asking what our policy was on this, I think he can be classified as a raider. Uh, I'd like to just put it out there that I'm not taking a position on the matter. I was just saying that these inactivity policies seem to be pretty darn arbitrary one way or another. That said, a "no raids whatsoever" policy doesn't seem that workable... Inactivity happens, and if it does then the GDP will be lost, by stab reset or by raid. At least by raid, the GDP goes back into the game. But, again, I'm not taking a position on this* Edit: *Yet
|
|
9 posts
|
Post by wubstep on Mar 30, 2015 0:44:30 GMT
>just now ask for screens after my news feed has dumped half of the shit he did to me >we're bullying him by attacking him after he attacked me >you then have one of your multis attack lemon before actually talking with him >continued to attack NO SHIT LEFTIST, YOU NEVER OFFERED ME REPS OR ANYTHING, YOU JUST WANTED ME TO ACCEPT GETTING ATTACKED BECAUSE L0L YOUR ALLIANCE IS BIG. YOUR DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN IS AWFUL News don't delete themselves until awhile unless you deleted them manually. Lemon and yourself was both told not to attack again and to peace but you indeed did attack again. I can post the other comms if you want. >powerful airforce He bombed me 3 times, just on one of them his airforce got shot down. >this shit right here Are you new to the game or something? Last time I really paid any attention, most alliance leaders didn't send threats out to people who were getting raided by their members. Last time I really played, alliance leaders were p much free to deal with raiders without someone like you raining on their bloc parade. >no reps ever offered, only memes Seriously what are you even arguing for here l0l. Tbh you should just say that you're abusing your position to make this game even more l0l, then I wouldn't have a problem with this at all.
|
|
234 posts
|
Post by sirscarf on Mar 30, 2015 0:47:28 GMT
Wait, who's quitting? grumble grumble bullies making dedgaem even dedder grumblenewfag detected >newfag Yep, this is my first iteration. Is there a problem with that? Hm?
|
|